Hyphenation ofaansprakelijkheidsvraag

Linguistic Analysis of "aansprakelijkheidsvraag" (Dutch)

1. Examination & Pronunciation:

The word "aansprakelijkheidsvraag" is a complex Dutch noun meaning "liability question". It's a compound word, built from several morphemes. Pronunciation involves a series of vowel and consonant clusters typical of Dutch, requiring careful syllabification.

2. Syllable Division:

Following Dutch syllabification rules, which prioritize vowel sounds and avoid splitting digraphs (like 'sp' or 'vr'), the word is divided as follows (see JSON output for the orthographic representation).

3. Morphemic Analysis:

• Prefix: aan- (origin: Proto-Germanic, function: indicates initiation or addition)
• Root: sprakelijk (origin: Middle Dutch spreken 'to speak', related to 'speak' in English, function: relates to being able to speak for oneself, hence 'responsible')
• Suffix: -heids- (origin: Germanic, function: nominalizing suffix, forming an abstract noun)
• Suffix: -vraag (origin: Middle Dutch vragen 'to ask', function: noun, 'question')

4. Stress Identification:

The primary stress falls on the penultimate syllable: heids-vraag.

5. Phonetic Transcription:

/aːnˈspraːkələˌɦɛitsˈvraːx/

6. Edge Case Review:

Dutch syllabification can be tricky with consonant clusters. The 'vr' cluster is always kept together. The 'lijk' sequence is also treated as a unit.

7. Grammatical Role:

The word is primarily a noun. Syllabification remains consistent regardless of grammatical function, as the word doesn't undergo significant morphological changes when used in different contexts.

8. Definition & Semantics:

• Definition: A question concerning legal or moral responsibility.
• Translation: Liability question
• Grammatical Category: Noun (de-word)
• Synonyms: aansprakelijkheidskwestie, verantwoordelijkheidsvraag
• Antonyms: (difficult to find a direct antonym, as it's a question, not a state)
• Examples:
  • "De rechter stelde een aansprakelijkheidsvraag aan de verdachte." (The judge asked the suspect a liability question.)
  • "De discussie draaide om een belangrijke aansprakelijkheidsvraag." (The discussion revolved around an important liability question.)

9. Phonological Comparison:

• verantwoordelijkheid: ver-ant-woor-de-lijk-heid (similar structure, stress on the penultimate syllable)
• rechtszekerheid: rechts-ze-ker-heid (similar suffix -heid, stress on the penultimate syllable)
• arbeidsvoorwaarden: ar-beids-voor-waar-den (compound noun, stress pattern varies, but demonstrates Dutch compounding)

The differences in syllable division arise from the specific consonant and vowel sequences within each word. The 'vr' cluster is consistently maintained, and vowel clusters dictate syllable boundaries.

10. Division Rules:

• Rule 1: Vowel-Based Syllabification: Syllables are generally formed around vowel sounds.
• Rule 2: Consonant Cluster Preservation: Consonant clusters like 'sp', 'vr', 'lijk' are kept intact within a syllable.
• Rule 3: Avoidance of Single-Letter Syllables: Dutch avoids syllables consisting of a single consonant.
• Rule 4: Stress on Penultimate Syllable: In many compound nouns, the stress falls on the penultimate syllable.

11. Special Considerations:

The length of the word and the multiple suffixes make it a complex case. The 'lijk' sequence, while a consonant cluster, functions somewhat as a single unit phonologically.