Hyphenation ofindelingsmogelijkheid

Dutch Word Analysis: indelingsmogelijkheid

1. Examination & Pronunciation:

The word "indelingsmogelijkheid" is a complex Dutch noun. Its pronunciation involves a series of vowel and consonant clusters typical of Dutch morphology. It's a compound word, built from several morphemes.

2. Syllable Division:

Following Dutch syllabification rules, which prioritize vowel sounds and avoid breaking up consonant clusters where possible, the word is divided as follows (see JSON output for the orthographic representation).

3. Morphemic Analysis:

• Prefix: in- (origin: Germanic, function: negation/internalization, creating a verbal noun)
• Root: deling (origin: Germanic, function: noun, 'division', from delen 'to divide')
• Suffix: -s (origin: Germanic, function: genitive marker, forming a possessive or adjectival relationship)
• Suffix: -mogelijkheid (origin: Dutch, function: noun-forming suffix, meaning 'possibility', derived from mogelijk 'possible')

4. Stress Identification:

The primary stress falls on the penultimate syllable: mogelijkheid. Dutch stress is generally penultimate, but compound words can have complex stress patterns.

5. Phonetic Transcription:

/ɪnˈdɛlɪŋsˌmoːɣəˈlɛitɦɛit/

6. Edge Case Review:

Dutch allows for relatively long syllables, and the syllable lijkheid is a common ending. The 'g' in deling can be pronounced as a velar fricative [ɣ] or a velar stop [x], depending on regional variation.

7. Grammatical Role:

The word functions as a noun. Syllabification and stress remain consistent regardless of its grammatical function within a sentence.

8. Definition & Semantics:

• Definition: The possibility of categorization or classification.
• Translation: Possibility of classification/categorization.
• Grammatical Category: Noun (feminine)
• Synonyms: categorisatiemogelijkheid, indelingkans
• Antonyms: onmogelijkheid tot indeling (impossibility of classification)
• Examples: "De indelingsmogelijkheid van de boeken was complex." (The possibility of classifying the books was complex.)

9. Phonological Comparison:

• verantwoordelijkheid (responsibility): ver-an-t-woor-de-lijk-heid. Similar structure with multiple suffixes. Stress on woor.
• levensmogelijkheid (possibility of life): le-vens-mo-ge-lijk-heid. Similar suffix mogelijkheid. Stress on lijk.
• bestemmingsmogelijkheid (possibility of destination): bes-tem-mings-mo-ge-lijk-heid. Similar suffix mogelijkheid. Stress on lijk.

The syllable division in all these words follows the same principles: prioritizing vowel sounds and avoiding breaking up consonant clusters. The length of syllables varies, but the core rules remain consistent.

10. Division Rules:

• Vowel-Based Division: Syllables are generally formed around vowel sounds.
• Consonant Cluster Preservation: Consonant clusters are kept together within a syllable whenever possible.
• Suffix Separation: Suffixes are typically separated into their own syllables.
• Compound Word Syllabification: Each component of a compound word is syllabified independently before being combined.

11. Special Considerations:

The 'ng' cluster in deling is a common feature of Dutch and is treated as a single unit within the syllable. The pronunciation of the 'g' can vary regionally.

12. Alternative Pronunciations/Regional Variations:

The pronunciation of the 'g' sound can vary between a voiced velar fricative [ɣ] in the Randstad area and a voiceless velar fricative [x] in other regions. This doesn't affect the syllable division.