Hyphenation ofuitbreidingsmogelijkheden

Dutch Word Analysis: uitbreidingsmogelijkheden

1. Examination & Pronunciation:

The word "uitbreidingsmogelijkheden" is a complex Dutch noun meaning "expansion possibilities." It's formed through extensive compounding and derivation. Pronunciation involves a mix of vowel qualities and consonant clusters typical of Dutch.

2. Syllable Division:

Following Dutch syllabification rules, which generally favor open syllables (CV) and avoid breaking up consonant clusters unless absolutely necessary, the division is as follows (see JSON output for the orthographic representation).

3. Morphemic Analysis:

• Prefix: uit- (origin: Germanic, function: intensifying/extending action)
• Root: breid- (origin: Germanic, related to breed 'wide', function: core meaning of 'expand')
• Suffixes:
  • -ing- (origin: Germanic, function: forming a noun from a verb, indicating process)
  • -s- (origin: Germanic, function: plural marker, though here it's part of a larger derivational suffix)
  • -mogelijk- (origin: Germanic, function: adjective meaning 'possible', forming a compound noun)
  • -heden- (origin: Germanic, function: nominalizing suffix, creating a noun of abstract quality)

4. Stress Identification:

The primary stress falls on the antepenultimate syllable: mogelijk. Dutch stress is generally on the penultimate or antepenultimate syllable, with longer words tending towards antepenultimate stress.

5. Phonetic Transcription:

/œytˈbrɛidɪŋsmɔɣəˈlɛkɦədən/

6. Edge Case Review:

Dutch allows for relatively complex consonant clusters, and the word contains several. Syllabification aims to avoid breaking these clusters unless they are exceptionally difficult to pronounce. The 'sch' cluster is treated as a single unit.

7. Grammatical Role:

The word is exclusively a noun. Its complex structure doesn't allow for easy conversion to other parts of speech without significant morphological changes. Syllabification remains consistent regardless of its function within a sentence.

8. Definition & Semantics:

• Word: uitbreidingsmogelijkheden
• Grammatical Category: Noun (feminine)
• English Translation: expansion possibilities, opportunities for expansion
• Synonyms: groeimogelijkheden (growth possibilities), ontwikkelingsmogelijkheden (development possibilities)
• Antonyms: beperkingen (limitations), krimp (shrinkage)
• Examples:
  • "De gemeente onderzoekt de uitbreidingsmogelijkheden van de haven." (The municipality is investigating the expansion possibilities of the harbor.)
  • "We bespraken de uitbreidingsmogelijkheden tijdens de vergadering." (We discussed the expansion possibilities during the meeting.)

9. Phonological Comparison:

• verantwoordelijkheden (responsibilities): ui-tbrei-dings-mo-ge-lijk-he-den vs. ver-ant-woor-de-lijk-he-den. Both have similar complex structures with multiple suffixes. The difference lies in the initial consonant cluster and the vowel qualities.
• arbeidsomstandigheden (working conditions): ui-tbrei-dings-mo-ge-lijk-he-den vs. ar-beids-om-stan-di-gheden. This word also features a long sequence of syllables and suffixes. The initial consonant cluster differs, and the vowel sounds are distinct.
• levensomstandigheden (living conditions): ui-tbrei-dings-mo-ge-lijk-he-den vs. le-vens-om-stan-di-gheden. Similar syllable count and suffix structure, but different root and initial consonant clusters.

10. Division Rules:

• Rule 1: Open Syllable Preference: Dutch favors creating open syllables (CV) whenever possible. This is applied throughout the word.
• Rule 2: Consonant Cluster Preservation: Consonant clusters are generally kept intact unless they are exceptionally difficult to pronounce. This applies to 'br', 'sch', and 'lijk'.
• Rule 3: Vowel Grouping: Vowel groups are often treated as a single syllable, as seen in 'ding' and 'lijk'.

11. Special Considerations:

The word's length and complexity make it a challenging case for syllabification. The interplay between derivational and inflectional suffixes requires careful consideration. Regional variations in pronunciation might slightly affect syllable boundaries, but the core division remains consistent.