Hyphenation ofveranderingsmogelijkheid

Linguistic Analysis of "veranderingsmogelijkheid" (Dutch)

1. Examination & Pronunciation:

The word "veranderingsmogelijkheid" is a complex Dutch noun meaning "possibility of change." It's pronounced with a relatively even stress distribution, though the penultimate syllable receives slightly more emphasis. The 'g' is a voiced velar fricative /ɣ/, and 'ij' is a diphthong /ɛi/.

2. Syllable Division:

Following Dutch syllabification rules, which generally favor open syllables (CV) and avoid consonant clusters at syllable boundaries where possible, the word breaks down as follows (using only original letters):

3. Morphemic Analysis:

• Prefix: ver- (Germanic origin) - Function: Indicates a change of state or action.
• Root: ander- (Germanic origin, related to "another") - Function: Core meaning of "change."
• Suffixes:
  • -ing- (Germanic origin) - Function: Forms a nominalization, indicating a process.
  • -s- (Germanic origin) - Function: Genitive marker, linking to the following noun.
  • -mogelijkheid (Dutch, composed of mogelijkheid - possibility) - Function: Noun meaning "possibility." This is further broken down into mog- (can, able) and -elijkheid (suffix denoting quality or state).

4. Stress Identification:

The primary stress falls on the antepenultimate syllable: mo-ge-lijk-heid. Dutch stress is generally weak and predictable, but this syllable receives slightly more prominence.

5. Phonetic Transcription:

/vəˈrɑndərɪŋs.moːɣəˈlɛit.hɛit/

6. Edge Case Review:

Dutch allows for some flexibility in syllabification, particularly with consonant clusters. However, the proposed division adheres to the principle of maximizing open syllables.

7. Grammatical Role:

The word is exclusively a noun. Syllabification and stress remain consistent regardless of its grammatical function within a sentence.

8. Definition & Semantics:

• Definition: The possibility of change; the capacity to be altered.
• Grammatical Category: Noun (feminine)
• Translation: Possibility of change
• Synonyms: veranderingskans (chance of change), transformatiemogelijkheid (possibility of transformation)
• Antonyms: stabiliteit (stability), onveranderlijkheid (unchangeability)
• Examples:
  • "De veranderingsmogelijkheid is klein." (The possibility of change is small.)
  • "We moeten de veranderingsmogelijkheid onderzoeken." (We must investigate the possibility of change.)

9. Phonological Comparison:

• "verantwoordelijkheid" (responsibility): ver-an-t-woor-de-lijk-heid. Similar structure with prefixes and suffixes.
• "overeenstemming" (agreement): o-ver-een-stem-ming. Demonstrates similar vowel and consonant combinations.
• "begrijpelijkheid" (comprehensibility): be-grijp-e-lijk-heid. Shows the common -lijkheid suffix and similar syllabic patterns.

The differences in syllable division arise from the specific consonant and vowel sequences within each word, but the underlying principles of maximizing open syllables and avoiding complex consonant clusters at syllable boundaries remain consistent.

10. Division Rules:

• Rule 1: Open Syllable Preference: Dutch favors syllables ending in vowels (CV). This is applied throughout the word.
• Rule 2: Consonant Cluster Resolution: When consonant clusters occur, they are often broken up to create open syllables, but not always.
• Rule 3: Morpheme Boundaries: Syllable boundaries often coincide with morpheme boundaries.

11. Special Considerations:

The 'ij' diphthong is treated as a single unit for syllabification purposes. The 'g' sound can be pronounced differently depending on the region, but this doesn't affect the syllable division.