Hyphenation ofnonapplicableness
Syllable Division:
non-ap-pli-ca-ble-ness
Phonetic Transcription:(how the word sounds using IPA symbols)
/ˌnɑn.æp.lɪ.kə.bl̩.nəs/
Stress Pattern:(which syllables are emphasized when speaking)
000100
Primary stress falls on the fourth syllable ('ca'). The other syllables are unstressed.
Syllables are the building blocks of words - each one typically contains a vowel sound
Open syllable, unstressed.
Open syllable, unstressed.
Closed syllable, unstressed.
Open syllable, stressed.
Closed syllable with syllabic consonant, unstressed.
Closed syllable, unstressed.
Morphemes are the smallest meaningful parts of words: prefixes (beginning), roots (core meaning), and suffixes (ending)
Prefix: non-
Latin origin, negation
Root: applic-
Latin origin, to apply
Suffix: -able-ness
Latin and Old English origins, adjective and noun forming suffixes
The quality or state of not being applicable; irrelevance.
Examples:
"The nonapplicableness of the rule to this case was immediately apparent."
Words with similar syllable patterns or pronunciation features
Similar structure with multiple suffixes.
Similar prefix and suffix structure.
Similar suffix structure.
The linguistic principles used to determine where syllables begin and end
Vowel Rule
Each syllable generally contains one vowel sound.
Consonant Cluster Rule
Consonant clusters are often split, but attempts are made to keep affixes intact.
Affix Rule
Prefixes and suffixes generally form separate syllables.
Syllabic Consonant Rule
/l/ can form a syllable when following a consonant.
Important exceptions or unusual features in this word's pronunciation or structure
The word's length and complexity.
The potential for a syllabic /l/ in 'ble'.
Summary:
The word 'nonapplicableness' is divided into six syllables: non-ap-pli-ca-ble-ness. It consists of the prefix 'non-', the root 'applic-', and the suffixes '-able' and '-ness'. The primary stress falls on the fourth syllable ('ca'). The syllabification follows standard English rules, with each syllable containing a vowel sound and affixes generally forming separate syllables.
Detailed Analysis:
Linguistic Analysis of "nonapplicableness"
1. Pronunciation Examination:
The word "nonapplicableness" is a complex word with multiple morphemes. Its pronunciation in US English involves a combination of vowel sounds, consonant clusters, and stress patterns.
2. Syllable Division:
Following English syllabification rules, the word is divided as follows (using only original letters):
non-ap-pli-ca-ble-ness
3. Morphemic Analysis:
- Prefix: non- (Latin origin, meaning "not") - Negation.
- Root: applic- (Latin applicare - to apply) - The core meaning of applying.
- Suffix: -able (Latin -abilis) - Adjective forming suffix, meaning "capable of being".
- Suffix: -ness (Old English -nes) - Noun forming suffix, denoting a state or quality.
4. Stress Identification:
The primary stress falls on the fourth syllable: non-ap-pli-ca-ble-ness.
5. Phonetic Transcription:
/ˌnɑn.æp.lɪ.kə.bl̩.nəs/
6. Edge Case Review:
The syllable "ble" is a potential edge case, as it could be pronounced with a syllabic consonant /bl̩/. This is a common feature in English, particularly after a liquid consonant.
7. Grammatical Role:
"Nonapplicableness" functions solely as a noun. There are no shifts in syllabification or stress if it were to function as another part of speech, as it is a derived noun.
8. Definition & Semantics:
- Definition: The quality or state of not being applicable; irrelevance.
- Grammatical Category: Noun
- Synonyms: inapplicability, irrelevance, unsuitability
- Antonyms: applicability, relevance, suitability
- Examples: "The nonapplicableness of the rule to this case was immediately apparent."
9. Phonological Comparison:
- Impossibility: im-pos-si-bil-i-ty - Similar structure with multiple suffixes. Stress falls on the third syllable.
- Unpredictability: un-pre-dict-a-bil-i-ty - Similar prefix and suffix structure. Stress falls on the third syllable.
- Responsibility: re-spon-si-bil-i-ty - Similar suffix structure. Stress falls on the third syllable.
The consistent stress pattern in these words (third syllable from the end) highlights a common tendency in English to stress the root syllable when multiple suffixes are attached. "Nonapplicableness" deviates slightly, with stress on the fourth syllable, likely due to the length and complexity of the root and preceding prefix.
10. Division Rules:
- Vowel Rule: Each syllable generally contains one vowel sound.
- Consonant Cluster Rule: Consonant clusters are often split, but attempts are made to keep affixes intact.
- Affix Rule: Prefixes and suffixes generally form separate syllables.
- Syllabic Consonant Rule: /l/ can form a syllable when following a consonant.
11. Special Considerations:
The word's length and complexity make it prone to mispronunciation and varying syllabification attempts. The syllabic /l/ in "ble" is a potential point of variation.
12. Alternative Pronunciations/Regional Variations:
Some speakers might reduce the vowel sounds in unstressed syllables, leading to a more rapid and less distinct pronunciation. Regional accents could also influence vowel quality and stress placement.
The hottest word splits in English (US)
See what terms are trending and getting hyphenated by users right now.
What is hyphenation
Hyphenation is the process of splitting words into syllables and inserting hyphens between them to facilitate the reading of a text. It is also used to divide words when the word cannot fit on a line.
This technique is particularly helpful in fully justified texts, where it aids in creating a uniform edge along both sides of a paragraph. Hyphenation rules vary among languages and even among different publications within the same language. It's a critical component in typesetting, significantly influencing the aesthetics and readability of printed and digital media. For instance, in compound adjectives like 'long-term solution', hyphens clarify relationships between words, preventing misinterpretation. Moreover, hyphenation can alter meanings: 'recreation' differs from 're-creation'.
With the advent of digital text, hyphenation algorithms have become more sophisticated, though still imperfect, sometimes requiring manual adjustment to ensure accuracy and coherence in text layout. Understanding and correctly applying hyphenation rules is therefore not only a matter of linguistic accuracy but also a key aspect of effective visual communication.