Hyphenation offunctiewaarderingen

Linguistic Analysis of "functiewaarderingen" (Dutch)

1. Examination & Pronunciation:

The word "functiewaarderingen" is a complex Dutch noun. It's pronounced with a relatively even stress distribution, though the penultimate syllable receives slightly more emphasis. The 'g' at the end is a velar fricative /ɣ/.

2. Syllable Division:

Following Dutch syllabification rules, which prioritize vowel sounds and avoid splitting diphthongs or consonant clusters where possible, the word breaks down as follows (see "syllable_division" in the JSON output).

3. Morphemic Analysis:

• Prefix: functie- (from Latin functio meaning 'function, performance'). Morphological function: denotes the core concept of a function.
• Root: -waarde- (from Old Dutch warda meaning 'value, worth'). Morphological function: indicates the concept of value.
• Suffix: -ringen (pluralization suffix, derived from Germanic roots). Morphological function: indicates plural form. The suffix -er- is also present, forming a nominalization.

4. Stress Identification:

The primary stress falls on the penultimate syllable: waar-de-rin-gen. Dutch stress is generally penultimate, but can be influenced by morphological structure.

5. Phonetic Transcription:

/fʏŋk.ti.waːr.də.ˈriŋ.ɣə(n)/

6. Edge Case Review:

Dutch allows for some flexibility in syllable division, particularly with consonant clusters. However, the division presented here is the most common and phonologically justifiable. The 'ie' diphthong is always kept together in a single syllable.

7. Grammatical Role:

"Functiewaarderingen" is exclusively a noun, specifically a plural noun. Syllabification and stress remain consistent regardless of its grammatical context within a sentence.

8. Definition & Semantics:

• Definition: The plural form of "functiewaardering," referring to the assessment or evaluation of job functions.
• Translation: Job function evaluations / Job worth assessments
• Grammatical Category: Noun (plural)
• Synonyms: Functiebeschrijvingen (job descriptions), functieanalyses (job analyses)
• Antonyms: None directly applicable.
• Examples:
  • "De functiewaarderingen werden aangepast aan de nieuwe eisen." (The job function evaluations were adjusted to the new requirements.)
  • "Het bedrijf baseerde de salarissen op de functiewaarderingen." (The company based the salaries on the job worth assessments.)

9. Phonological Comparison:

• 'verantwoordelijkheden' (responsibilities): ver-wan-t-woor-de-lijk-he-den. Similar syllable structure with multiple suffixes.
• 'arbeidsvoorwaarden' (employment conditions): ar-beids-voor-waar-den. Similar vowel-consonant alternation.
• 'opleidingsmogelijkheden' (training opportunities): op-lei-dings-mo-ge-lijk-he-den. Complex word with multiple morphemes and a similar stress pattern.

The differences in syllable division arise from the specific consonant clusters and vowel sequences within each word. Dutch avoids breaking up diphthongs and prefers to keep consonant clusters together when possible.

10. Division Rules:

• Vowel-Based Division: Syllables are generally formed around vowel sounds.
• Diphthong Preservation: Diphthongs (like 'ie') are kept within a single syllable.
• Consonant Cluster Handling: Consonant clusters are often kept together, especially if they are common in Dutch.
• Penultimate Stress: Primary stress typically falls on the penultimate syllable.

11. Special Considerations:

The 'ie' diphthong is a key consideration. The final '-en' suffix can sometimes be reduced to '-n' in spoken Dutch, but the written form remains consistent. Regional variations in pronunciation might affect the precise realization of vowels, but not the core syllable division.