Hyphenation ofre-integratiepoging

Dutch Word Analysis: re-integratiepoging

1. Examination & Pronunciation:

The word "re-integratiepoging" is a complex noun in Dutch, meaning "attempt at reintegration." It's formed through compounding and affixation. Pronunciation involves a sequence of vowels and consonants typical of Dutch, with potential for vowel reduction in unstressed syllables.

2. Syllable Division:

Following Dutch syllabification rules, which generally favor open syllables (CV) and avoid consonant clusters at syllable boundaries where possible, the division is as follows (using only original letters):

3. Morphemic Analysis:

• Prefix: re- (Latin, meaning "again," "back") - morphological function: repetition.
• Root: integratie (Latin via French, meaning "integration") - morphological function: core meaning.
• Suffix: -poging (Germanic origin, meaning "attempt") - morphological function: nominalization, creating a noun denoting an attempt.

4. Stress Identification:

Dutch stress is generally on the penultimate (second-to-last) syllable. In this case, the primary stress falls on tie.

5. Phonetic Transcription:

/rə.ɪn.tə.ɣraː.ti.ə.pɔ.ɣɪŋ/

6. Edge Case Review:

Dutch allows for some flexibility in syllable division, particularly with consonant clusters. However, the proposed division adheres to the principle of maximizing open syllables.

7. Grammatical Role:

The word is primarily a noun. Syllabification and stress remain consistent regardless of grammatical function, as it's a single, complex lexical item.

8. Definition & Semantics:

• Word: re-integratiepoging
• Grammatical Category: Noun (de)
• English Translation: Attempt at reintegration
• Synonyms: Herintegratiepoging, poging tot re-integratie
• Antonyms: Uitsluiting, isolatie (exclusion, isolation)
• Examples:
  • "De re-integratiepoging van de voormalige crimineel verliep succesvol." (The attempt at reintegration of the former criminal was successful.)
  • "Na jaren van uitsluiting volgde een re-integratiepoging." (After years of exclusion, an attempt at reintegration followed.)

9. Phonological Comparison:

• verantwoordelijkheid (responsibility): ver-wan-t-woor-de-lijk-heid. Similar complex structure with prefixes and suffixes. Stress on the penultimate syllable.
• mogelijkheid (possibility): mo-ge-lijk-heid. Shorter, but shares the -heid suffix. Stress on the antepenultimate syllable.
• uitnodiging (invitation): uit-no-di-ging. Similar structure with a prefix and suffix. Stress on the penultimate syllable.

The differences in syllable division arise from the varying lengths and complexities of the root and affixes. "re-integratiepoging" has a longer root (integratie) and a more complex combination of affixes, leading to a greater number of syllables.

10. Division Rules:

• Rule 1: Open Syllable Preference: Dutch favors open syllables (CV). This is applied throughout the word, dividing around vowels.
• Rule 2: Consonant Cluster Resolution: When consonant clusters occur, they are often broken up to create open syllables, but not always. In this case, the 'nt' in 'integratie' remains together as it's a common and accepted cluster.
• Rule 3: Prefix/Suffix Boundaries: Prefixes and suffixes are generally treated as separate syllables.

11. Special Considerations:

Vowel reduction is common in unstressed syllables in Dutch. The 'e' in 're-' and some of the vowels in 'integratie' may be reduced to a schwa /ə/. Regional variations in pronunciation might affect the precise realization of vowels, but not the core syllabification.