Hyphenation ofre-integratiebudgetten

Linguistic Analysis of "re-integratiebudgetten" (Dutch)

1. Examination & Pronunciation:

The word "re-integratiebudgetten" is a complex Dutch noun. It refers to budgets allocated for reintegration programs, typically for individuals seeking to re-enter the workforce. Pronunciation involves a series of vowel and consonant clusters, typical of Dutch morphology.

2. Syllable Division:

Following Dutch syllabification rules, which prioritize vowel sounds and consonant clusters, the word is divided as follows (see JSON output for the orthographic representation).

3. Morphemic Analysis:

• Prefix: re- (Latin, meaning "again," "back"). Morphological function: indicates repetition or reversal of an action.
• Root: integratie (Latin via French, meaning "integration"). Morphological function: core meaning of the word.
• Suffix: -budgetten (Dutch, derived from budget (French origin) + -ten (plural marker)). Morphological function: indicates multiple budgets.

4. Stress Identification:

Dutch stress is generally on the penultimate (second-to-last) syllable. In this case, the primary stress falls on tie.

5. Phonetic Transcription:

/rə.ɪn.tə.ɣraː.ti.ˈbʏ.dʒɛ.tə(n)/

6. Edge Case Review:

Dutch allows for complex consonant clusters, which can sometimes pose challenges in syllabification. However, the rules are relatively consistent. The 'budgetten' portion is a common pluralization pattern.

7. Grammatical Role:

The word is primarily a noun. Syllabification and stress remain consistent regardless of grammatical context.

8. Definition & Semantics:

• Definition: Budgets specifically designated for reintegration programs, often used to support individuals returning to the workforce after a period of unemployment or disability.
• Grammatical Category: Noun (plural)
• Translation: Reintegration budgets
• Synonyms: Herintegratiebudgetten (alternative spelling, same meaning)
• Antonyms: None directly applicable.
• Examples:
  • "De gemeente heeft de re-integratiebudgetten verhoogd." (The municipality has increased the reintegration budgets.)
  • "Met deze re-integratiebudgetten kunnen we meer mensen helpen." (With these reintegration budgets, we can help more people.)

9. Phonological Comparison:

• 'arbeidsbudgetten' (labor budgets): ar-beids-bud-get-ten. Similar syllable structure, demonstrating the consistent application of vowel-based syllabification.
• 'opleidingsbudgetten' (training budgets): op-lei-dings-bud-get-ten. Again, a comparable structure, with the suffix '-budgetten' consistently forming a separate syllable.
• 'financieringsbudgetten' (financing budgets): fi-nan-ci-e-rings-bud-get-ten. Shows how longer root words are divided, but the final '-budgetten' remains consistent.

10. Division Rules:

• Vowel-Based Syllabification: Each vowel sound generally forms the nucleus of a syllable.
• Consonant Cluster Handling: Consonant clusters are typically maintained within a syllable unless they are easily separable by a vowel sound.
• Prefix/Suffix Separation: Prefixes and suffixes are often treated as separate syllables, especially when they are clearly identifiable morphemes.

11. Special Considerations:

The 'ie' digraph in Dutch is a diphthong, and is treated as a single vowel sound for syllabification purposes. The 'g' sound can be pronounced differently depending on the region, but this doesn't affect the syllable division.